Home
Will O'the Wisp's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in Will O'the Wisp's LiveJournal:

    [ << Previous 20 ]
    Friday, October 9th, 2009
    1:04 pm
    Feeling rich
    I am feeling much richer today. Now that I know the Nobel prizes are handed
    out randomly, I feel that my chances have gone way up.
    Friday, October 2nd, 2009
    5:16 pm
    Ummm...
    So....am I missing something? Or is this the single most idiotic thing ever published
    in the history of the New York Times?

    From an op-ed regarding Polanski (PLEASE OH PLEASE do not turn this as a forum for
    random comments about the Polanski case!)

    The ... aims of criminal law are usually stated as revenge, deterrence, punishment and
    rehabilitation. Revenge is widely recognized as illegitimate...


    With you so far, more or less. I'm not sure how widely recognized revenge is as illegitimate,
    but I agree it ought to be. Also, I'm not sure I get the difference between ``revenge''
    and ``punishment'', but let's continue....

    As he has not, as far as we know, committed any crimes in the three decades he has been
    living in France and Switzerland, the objective of deterring him from committing a future
    crime carries no force.


    So now, having finally managed to close my jaw, I have to ask the question:

    Is this guy the only person on earth who doesn't understand that deterrence is primarily
    about deterring *other* potential criminals? Or am I the only person on earth who didn't
    realize there are people who don't understand this?
    Thursday, September 24th, 2009
    8:27 pm
    News Headline
    Via my sister:

    Reviews Mixed for First Performance of Peter, Paul and Shemp
    Saturday, September 19th, 2009
    9:11 pm
    Irony alert!
    Does anyone else find this as hilarious as I do?
    Tuesday, September 1st, 2009
    6:05 pm
    More geek stuff
    The goal: To write a simple batch program that backs up my hard drive incrementally.

    The tools available: 4NT (a souped up form of DOS) and cygwin; 4NT recognizes all the
    cygwin commands.

    The advice I *don't* want: "Go get a backup program". This should be a very very simple
    problem to solve.

    My current solution: The following two-line script:

    mkdir f:\%_month.%_day.%_year.%_hour.%_minute
    copy /h /x /a:a /s c:\* f:\%_month.%_day.%_year.%_hour.%_minute

    The first line creates, on my backup device, a new directory named after the date and
    time it is created. The second line recreates my entire directory tree within that new
    directory and copies those files that have been changed or created since the last backup.
    (/h means to include hidden files and directories; /x means to reset the archive bit to 0
    after copying; /a:a means to copy only those files with archive bit set to 1; /s means to
    recreate the whole directory tree.)

    The annoyance: In order to back up the six files that are new or changed since yesterday,
    I recreate my entire directory tree, with a vast number of empty directories.

    My attempt at a better solution: Two scripts, the second of which is called "ambrose":

    FIRST SCRIPT (ONE LINE):
    for /r %x in (*) call c:\ambrose %x

    SECOND SCRIPT (TWO LINES):
    if "%@attrib[%1,a]"=="1" (mkdir /n /s "f:\%_month.%_day.%_year.%_hour\%@replace[C:\,,%@path[%@full[%1]]]")
    if "%@attrib[%1,a]"=="1" (copy /h /x /a:a %1 "f:\%_month.%_day.%_year.%_hour\%@replace[C:\,,%@path[%@full[%1]]]")

    The variable %x stands for a file name. "For /r" means to run recursively through all file
    names in all subdirectories of the root.

    The second script creates a subdirectory and copies the file %x into it if and only if
    %x has its archive bit set to 1. (The /s on the mkdir allows it to make several
    subsubsub...subdirectories at a time, and the thing that starts with @replace is the full
    path to the file, minus the "C:\".)

    This gives me a nice compact directory containing only a few subdirectories, corresponding
    to files that have actually been updated and backed up---almost exactly what I want.

    The fly in the ointment: "for /r %x in (*)" does not include %x's that are inside hidden
    directories. As far as I can tell, there is no way around this. (Other than, maybe, to
    unhide all directories, keep track of which ones have been unhidden, and then hide them
    again after everything is over.)

    I am sure there are people on my friends list with far better programming skills than mine,
    and suspect there might even be some who are more intimate with 4NT than I am. Is there a
    trick I'm missing?
    Saturday, August 29th, 2009
    4:27 pm
    Etiquette question
    If you are in a coffee shop working at an open table and there's
    a really really cute girl in a pink sweater in the armchair right
    next to you, reading a book with her legs draped over the arm
    of the chair, is it okay to put your penis in her vagina?

    Please respond IMMEDIATELY.
    Wednesday, August 26th, 2009
    6:09 pm
    It WAS the hard drive!!!!
    Yup, it was the hard drive.

    To recap: I had a recent clone, but it didn't fit in my computer. When I tried to
    boot from it via the USB drive, I was told it had no boot sector.

    My plan was to clone the clone onto something that WOULD fit into my computer. But
    I was afraid this would fail both because of a) the apparent absence of the boot
    sector and b) the likelihood that my problems were being caused by something other
    than the hard drive.

    But! I cloned the clone, popped in the clone-of-the-clone and I am absolutely up
    and running. My computer is identical to what it was two weeks ago, and it's about
    to be identical to what it was a few days ago, as soon as I restore from recent backups.

    Identical, that is, except for an extra 180 gigs of hard drive. (As long as I was at
    it, I went for the half-terabyte.)

    Thanks very much to wrisz, drwex and ron for all their good attempts to help. As it
    turned out, my original plan was all I needed, but things could have been very different
    and it's reassuring to know that I've got good and knowledgeable friends willing to
    help out.

    P.S. Clone your hard drive!
    Tuesday, August 25th, 2009
    11:01 am
    Windows geek questions
    1) When I boot into Vista, I usually get about a minute or two before my system more or less
    freezes. It's not totally frozen in the sense that I can still move my cursor around, but
    pretty much nothing responds to it. Frequently, the cursor turns into that little blue
    circle thing (i.e. the successor to the little hourglass thing), either permanently or just
    when I hover over the task bar, but whatever it looks like, nothing responds to it. Sometimes
    I can manage a ctrl-alt-escape; other times I get no response to that.

    2) When I boot into safe mode, everything works fine. I'm posting from safe mode now.

    3) When I push the start button, any of a number of things happens randomly. Either Windows
    tries to do its normal boot sequence, or it tells me that it was shut down improperly last
    time (which is always true) and offers me safe mode, or it insists on doing its lengthy
    "startup repair" process which never seems to actually repair anything, or it spontaneously
    runs chkdsk. The one time it did the latter it recovered files called isuspm.exe and ntfs.sys .

    4) I have a clone! I clone my drive regularly, and my most recent clone is about two weeks
    old. (I also have backups of everything I've done in the interim.) Comparing the contents of
    the various system directories on the clone and on my hard drive, I found differences in
    three files in \windows\system32, namely perfc009.dat, perfh009.dat, and PerfStringBackup.ini .
    I have copied these from the clone to the hard drive (overwriting what's on the hard drive).
    I have not tried a reboot since then.

    5) The files that chkdsk said it had recovered appear to be no different on the clone than
    they are on the hard drive.

    6) My clone is on a drive that will not fit in my laptop. I have ordered a new blank drive
    for delivery tomorrow.

    7) Plan A: Clone the existing clone onto the new disk that will arrive tomorrow, then pop
    that new disk into the machine.

    8) Plan B: Clone the existing clone onto the existing hard drive right now; this has the
    advantage that I don't have to wait till tomorrow.

    9) Questions:

    Question 1: Am I right in assuming that Plan A is pretty much sure to solve this problem?

    Question 2: Is there any significant danger to Plan B? (My vision is something like: The
    cloning process fails, my hard drive becomes completely unusable, and I no longer have a
    machine on which to carry out Plan A tomorrow, though of course I can always borrow one.)

    Question 3: What am I overlooking?
    Friday, July 24th, 2009
    11:32 am
    geek question
    So here is the page I made for reading blogs.

    It works fine in Firefox. It also works mostly fine in IE, with the following exception:

    If I click on the blog "Not even wrong" (the problem is specific to this blog), it opens
    in the right hand panel, just like it ought to. But then the *next* blog I click on
    (whatever it may be) opens in a new window instead of in the right-hand panel. Somehow
    navigating to "Not even wrong" causes IE to ignore all my future "target =" specifications.

    I am mystified. Any insights? (Note: I want to solve the mystery. "Don't use IE" does
    not solve the mystery.)

    Edited to add: I should mention that changing the name of the target (which is
    currently "show") has no effect.
    Thursday, July 23rd, 2009
    8:05 pm
    Just what I needed
    Yes, I realize everyone in the world already knew how to do this except me.
    But now I know too!

    I made a page so I can read all my favorite blogs in one
    convenient place. Goodbye to that last little dollop of productivity!
    Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009
    4:01 pm
    The Adventures of WillO, part something
    Last night was my first night at home after several days out of town, so when
    I was awakened at 4:18 AM by a knock at the front door, my first thought (after
    "probably just a dream") was "probably just some burglar checking to see if
    I'm back yet". That seemed enough of an explanation, so I went back to sleep,
    at least until the doorbell rang. At that point I felt I should probably get
    up and locate my cellphone before the home invasion got entirely underway. At
    some point in my sleepy phone-search, I glanced out the window and saw two
    police cars (but no police officers) in my driveway.

    It took another five minutes or so to locate a bathrobe, whereupon I wandered out
    to the garage and found two police officers (one male, one female), equipped
    with flashlights and poking around among the bondage equipment.

    I'll pause for a moment to let that part sink in.

    Okay, are we ready to go on now?

    They explained that a) my car was sticking out of the garage into the driveway by
    a few inches (which I was well aware of, because I hadn't felt like moving the
    junk that was sitting in front of it to make room to get it entirely inside) and
    b) my lights were on (which came as major news to me). The combination had seemed
    weird enough that they'd wondered whether something needed their attention.

    Of course when I found them, they were nowhere near the car and very definitely
    focused entirely on the bondage furniture, but that, I think, can be attributed to
    an entirely natural burst of curiosity.

    I explained that the extension into the driveway---and the consequent open garage
    door---were intentional, thanked them for calling my attention to the lights,
    turned the lights off, and staggered back into the house. I have no idea how
    much longer they stuck around.
    Saturday, July 18th, 2009
    5:59 pm
    tipping policy
    Over the weekend, my daughter and I will receive a total of three one-hour
    aerial silk lessons from a professional instructor.

    Is it appropriate and/or expected to tip said instructor? And if so, how much?
    Thursday, July 16th, 2009
    10:42 am
    Powerisers
    They arrived today. I walked twice around the house, needing my twin
    walking sticks pretty much constantly for the first circuit but only
    intermittently for the second. The biggest challenge was standing up
    in the first place. I am now drenched in sweat and cancelling my usual
    morning workout.
    Wednesday, July 1st, 2009
    4:41 pm
    Where the guys are, take two
    This is your second notice that I have a smart, professional, generally awesome monogamous
    female friend (age 41) who is eager to meet a smart, professional, generally awesome
    monogamous man, capable of appreciating such a woman, in the Boston area. The acceptable
    age range is very wide.

    Although my circle of Boston friends is largely awesome, it is also largely non-monogamous.
    But I entreat your help in identifying the friends who might qualify and, better yet,
    identifying friends-of-friends and friends-of-friends-of-friends who seem to be likely
    candidates.

    I vouch for major awesomeness on the lady's part. Who do you got?
    Tuesday, June 30th, 2009
    5:07 pm
    Paypal is a fucking idiot
    me: "A street address has been added to my account. It is not my street
    address. It has never been my street address. I do not recognize this
    address in any way. I'd like to know when it was added and whether it has
    ever been used for any transactions."

    them: "Oh. well that's probably the street address associated with your
    bank account."

    me: "No, MY address is associated with my bank account. i do not recognize
    this address."

    them: "Well, don't worry. There is NO WAY we could have added an address
    to your profile. SO there's nothing to worry about."

    me: "I KNOW you didn't add the address. Neither did I. That's why I'd
    like some help trying to figure out who did."

    them: "Really, it's not an issue. We CANNOT add addresses to user
    accounts."

    me: "Is there someone else I can talk to?"

    them: "Yes, I can connect you with another department."

    me: "Which other department?"

    them: "It's a different department."

    me: "Are they smarter than you?"

    them: "Yes".

    me: "Please connect me then."

    That was one hour ago. I remain on hold.
    Monday, June 22nd, 2009
    9:16 am
    boston area housemate?
    I have a (female) friend, currently a grad student at Cornell, who will be
    visiting Harvard for one year starting a couple of months from now. She is
    looking for a place to live, preferably with easy access (on foot or by T)
    to Harvard Square. She describes herself as a "clean freak". Let me know
    if you know of something.
    Friday, June 19th, 2009
    3:58 pm
    My afternoon
    My afternoon.

    By WillO.

    I type "tex foo". As I do approximately 30 times a day, every day of my life.

    TeX complains about a piece of code. As it sometimes does.

    I comment out the area around that piece of code. I type "TeX foo". TeX continues
    to complain about the code, even though it's commented out.

    I *erase* the offending lines. I type "TeX foo". TeX continues to complain about
    the code, even though it's no longer there.

    I rename foo (without the offending code) foo2. I type "tex foo2". TeX continues to
    complain about the code, even though it has never been a part of foo2.

    I create a new file, called foo3, the contents of which are "Hello world. \bye". I
    type "tex foo3". TeX continues to complain about the code that used to be in foo.

    I close my command window and open a new one. I type "tex foo3". Same complaint.

    I reboot. Same complaint.

    I move to a different directory, create a new file called foo4, with content "this is
    a test. \bye". I type "tex foo4" and it works great.

    In that same new directory, I create another new file called foo5, with content
    "this is a totally different test \bye". I type "tex foo5". The output says
    "this is a test."

    It eventually becomes apparent that I get to TeX exactly one new file (call it newfoo)
    per directory. All subsequent attempts to invoke TeX from that directory (say with
    "tex newfoo2") result in the same output as "tex newfoo". EVEN IF I HAVE ERASED THE FILE
    newfoo.

    Let me repeat that: Once I've fed a file to TeX, it believes forever after that any
    time I invoke it from that directory, it should continue to act on the contents of that
    file EVEN IF THE FILE IS NOT THERE.

    Yes, I finally figured it out. I want my afternoon back.
    Thursday, June 11th, 2009
    8:45 pm
    A word to the wise
    In addition to backing up my hard drive regularly, I clone it once a a month
    or so. (A clone creates an exact, bit-by-bit copy of the drive, including
    all the system files, executables, etc.)

    My laptop is down for a few days (waiting for delivery of a new motherboard).
    So I borrowed a laptop from one of [info]naiad1's kids, plugged in my
    clone, and I am up and running.

    This laptop won't actually boot off the clone (different hardware needs
    different drivers) but to my surprise, almost all my software runs just
    fine, and for all practical purposes this is just like having my own
    computer back. I should have done this a few days ago when my computer
    first went down.

    I always figured the clone would get me back up and running in an instant if
    my hard drive ever died; I hadn't stopped to think that it would do the
    same if the computer itself crashed. This is GREAT.

    Clone your hard drive!
    Saturday, May 30th, 2009
    8:46 pm
    P.S.
    Addendum to my last two posts:

    While driving home yesterday, I passed by a scene of major commotion, with
    at least 20 police cars and several streets blocked off. I switched my
    radio to AM looking for an explanation but didn't get anything.

    When I arrived home, my phone was ringing re the bomb scare I had triggered.
    I failed at the time to connect this with all the hubbub.

    It is now clear, however, from reading news reports, that this was MY hubbub.
    Several streets were closed and several neighboring houses and businesses
    were evacuated. At that exact time, in that exact place.
    Friday, May 29th, 2009
    4:58 pm
    A round of email
    (This will make sense only if you've read my previous post.)


    FROM ME TO THE CHIEF SAFETY OFFICER:


    Well---that was easily a week's worth of excitement. I am very
    sorry indeed to have caused so much trouble for so many people,
    you among them. In retrospect, I can see how the package I
    mailed might have looked suspicious, but I completely failed to
    foresee it.

    Thanks for your good cheer and for not pulling out the explosives
    without checking in with me. I do realize that you and everyone
    else involved surely had much better things to do today, and I
    wish I hadn't prevented you from doing them.


    HIS RESPONSE:


    This was an unfortunate incident and I understand there was no malice
    on your part, but certainly a lot of resources went into the response.
    I say we take credit for training and move on. Have a good weekend.
[ << Previous 20 ]
About LiveJournal.com

Advertisement